<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: High Times for a Test of the Castle Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelegality.com/2009/02/12/high-times-for-a-test-of-the-castle-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2009/02/12/high-times-for-a-test-of-the-castle-doctrine/</link>
	<description>An Online Law Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Self Defense Power Store</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2009/02/12/high-times-for-a-test-of-the-castle-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2367</link>
		<dc:creator>Self Defense Power Store</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/121#comment-2367</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed your post, thanks.  I belive everyone should arm themselves and homes with some form of personal protection, whether it be a home alarm system, spy &amp; surveillance capibilities, to a small can of Mace, any deterant, anything.  I have made sure my daughter in college is well armed with some of these weapons, my wife as well. Arm youself America, you never know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed your post, thanks.  I belive everyone should arm themselves and homes with some form of personal protection, whether it be a home alarm system, spy &amp; surveillance capibilities, to a small can of Mace, any deterant, anything.  I have made sure my daughter in college is well armed with some of these weapons, my wife as well. Arm youself America, you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mines_a_45</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2009/02/12/high-times-for-a-test-of-the-castle-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>Mines_a_45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/121#comment-2342</guid>
		<description>I see no logical excuse for a person not to be able to defend ones self with any weapon when it becomes needed...Now let some fool enter someones home and attempt a violent crime has forfeit all rights and should be dealt with accordingly.And I do feel much safer knowing my girlfriend has my .45 with her when I leave for work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see no logical excuse for a person not to be able to defend ones self with any weapon when it becomes needed&#8230;Now let some fool enter someones home and attempt a violent crime has forfeit all rights and should be dealt with accordingly.And I do feel much safer knowing my girlfriend has my .45 with her when I leave for work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glock19</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2009/02/12/high-times-for-a-test-of-the-castle-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>glock19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/121#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>Come in my house.......die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come in my house&#8230;&#8230;.die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firearmslaw.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2009/02/12/high-times-for-a-test-of-the-castle-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>firearmslaw.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/121#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>First of all.  The Castle Doctrine is a common law rule.  It&#039;s ancient.  There is literally no state that does not recognize it statutorily or in case law. 2nd, just as the article mentions the &quot;weed harvest&quot; in the house is irrelevant to the self-defense issue.  I&#039;m guessing this guy wouldn&#039;t have been charged in a majority of states simply because of the protection of the Castle Doctrine not including the presumption.   What what are homeowners to do in a situation like this?? call the cops and wait?  Be a victim?  Americans have never been encouraged to be victims or be punished for not being one.  The Castle Doctrine doesn&#039;t encourage violence it is meant to safe guard your fundamental right to defense yourself and loved ones.  If someone wants to pick on a state with &quot;real dangerous and scawwy&quot; self-defense law, try Florida. Of course Harvard has already tried that... And blood is not running in the streets, or rather living rooms and kitchens, of Florida.  I have a hard time seeing how this type of law and incident does not deter  criminals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all.  The Castle Doctrine is a common law rule.  It&#8217;s ancient.  There is literally no state that does not recognize it statutorily or in case law. 2nd, just as the article mentions the &#8220;weed harvest&#8221; in the house is irrelevant to the self-defense issue.  I&#8217;m guessing this guy wouldn&#8217;t have been charged in a majority of states simply because of the protection of the Castle Doctrine not including the presumption.   What what are homeowners to do in a situation like this?? call the cops and wait?  Be a victim?  Americans have never been encouraged to be victims or be punished for not being one.  The Castle Doctrine doesn&#8217;t encourage violence it is meant to safe guard your fundamental right to defense yourself and loved ones.  If someone wants to pick on a state with &#8220;real dangerous and scawwy&#8221; self-defense law, try Florida. Of course Harvard has already tried that&#8230; And blood is not running in the streets, or rather living rooms and kitchens, of Florida.  I have a hard time seeing how this type of law and incident does not deter  criminals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dunlap</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2009/02/12/high-times-for-a-test-of-the-castle-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>Dunlap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/121#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>Hey, just found this when searching for into about the Castle Doctrine.  While I agree that under the letter of the law this probably does not fall under the doctrine.  But even if we don&#039;t *presume* that &quot;actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful force.&quot;, I think it&#039;s a pretty logical conclusion.  There is a 2 men in your house with knives.  Regardless of what brought them there, they forcefully entered the house with weapons.  Waste &#039;em.    

Disclaimer: I am a gun-owning pothead who lives in Texas.  LoL, there goes all my credibility :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just found this when searching for into about the Castle Doctrine.  While I agree that under the letter of the law this probably does not fall under the doctrine.  But even if we don&#8217;t *presume* that &#8220;actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful force.&#8221;, I think it&#8217;s a pretty logical conclusion.  There is a 2 men in your house with knives.  Regardless of what brought them there, they forcefully entered the house with weapons.  Waste &#8216;em.    </p>
<p>Disclaimer: I am a gun-owning pothead who lives in Texas.  LoL, there goes all my credibility <img src='http://www.thelegality.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
