<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word of the Week: Duress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelegality.com/2008/05/05/word-of-the-week-duress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/05/05/word-of-the-week-duress/</link>
	<description>An Online Law Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Kessler</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/05/05/word-of-the-week-duress/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Kessler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/60#comment-595</guid>
		<description>Some states (maybe most or all) have by statute precluded the duress defense from certain crimes such as murder and manslaughter, &lt;em&gt;see&lt;/em&gt;: Revised Code of Washington 9A.16.060(2).

One need not necessarily admit the crime to raise duress. Inconsistent defenses are not prohibited, &lt;em&gt;Washington v. Frost,&lt;/em&gt; 160 Wn.2d 765 (2007).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some states (maybe most or all) have by statute precluded the duress defense from certain crimes such as murder and manslaughter, <em>see</em>: Revised Code of Washington 9A.16.060(2).</p>
<p>One need not necessarily admit the crime to raise duress. Inconsistent defenses are not prohibited, <em>Washington v. Frost,</em> 160 Wn.2d 765 (2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

