<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymous Versus Scientology: Cyber Criminals or Vigilante Justice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/</link>
	<description>An Online Law Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Drwomb</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>Drwomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>#19  Get real.

Expect what? A bunch of magic card collecting internet losers committing gay computer  crimes from  the confines of their parents basement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19  Get real.</p>
<p>Expect what? A bunch of magic card collecting internet losers committing gay computer  crimes from  the confines of their parents basement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObjectiveGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>ObjectiveGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>#19  Get real.

Expect what? A bunch of magic card collecting internet losers committing gay computer  crimes from  the confines of their parents basement?  Drwomb is totally correct on this issue.  No one takes Anon seriously.  Here&#039;s a little hint: If you want people to join your side and listen to what you have to say, then I suggest you don&#039;t wear creepy masks and stupid outfits to your silly rallies of like 5 people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19  Get real.</p>
<p>Expect what? A bunch of magic card collecting internet losers committing gay computer  crimes from  the confines of their parents basement?  Drwomb is totally correct on this issue.  No one takes Anon seriously.  Here&#8217;s a little hint: If you want people to join your side and listen to what you have to say, then I suggest you don&#8217;t wear creepy masks and stupid outfits to your silly rallies of like 5 people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-2175</guid>
		<description>Anonymous is not just stopping the dangerious cult of Scientology, we all stand to protect people from other criminals as well, such as our partispiation in the prosecution and Conviction of a Canadian Child Moelester.  We Do Not Forgive! We Do Not Forget! Expect US!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous is not just stopping the dangerious cult of Scientology, we all stand to protect people from other criminals as well, such as our partispiation in the prosecution and Conviction of a Canadian Child Moelester.  We Do Not Forgive! We Do Not Forget! Expect US!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: totalrecall98</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>totalrecall98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-748</guid>
		<description>Drwomb is 100% correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drwomb is 100% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drwomb</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Drwomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Anonymous is nothing but cyber terrroists who just cannot mind their own business.  If someone wants to be a scientologist and give the COS their money, it has absolutely no bearing on anonymous.

These people are no different than the islamic terrorists responsible for 9/11.  You don&#039;t think those guys felt they were justified in destroying the twin towers?! Of course they did.  Scientologists are constantly udner attack by the fools, and I can completely undestand all the legal action.  I mean, what would you do if you had a nosy neighbor that was constantly threatening you and protestting outside of your house?  You would call the cops and/or sue, too. 

I am a staunch atheist.  I think all religions are a big giant sham.  But I recognize that the independant decisions of others to join COS is none of MY BUSINESS.  If someone wants to go jump off a bridge, then it&#039;s none of YOUR business unless they are going to land on you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous is nothing but cyber terrroists who just cannot mind their own business.  If someone wants to be a scientologist and give the COS their money, it has absolutely no bearing on anonymous.</p>
<p>These people are no different than the islamic terrorists responsible for 9/11.  You don&#8217;t think those guys felt they were justified in destroying the twin towers?! Of course they did.  Scientologists are constantly udner attack by the fools, and I can completely undestand all the legal action.  I mean, what would you do if you had a nosy neighbor that was constantly threatening you and protestting outside of your house?  You would call the cops and/or sue, too. </p>
<p>I am a staunch atheist.  I think all religions are a big giant sham.  But I recognize that the independant decisions of others to join COS is none of MY BUSINESS.  If someone wants to go jump off a bridge, then it&#8217;s none of YOUR business unless they are going to land on you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-41</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a Scientologist, nor do I agree that they are a &quot;religion&quot;; but as mentioned in your article, the Church of Scientology could press charges against anyone related to &quot;Anonymous&quot; under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).  So my question is this.  When &quot;Anonymous&quot; protested outside of the LA Scientology Church, couldn&#039;t the church have called police to press charges against the protesting group calling themselves &quot;Anonymous&quot; as culprits to the CFAA done against them?  
The video I saw showed a guy with a bullhorn speaking out against the Church of Scientology, with him only wearing sunglasses.  His mask was off, and identity revealed.  Everyone there walking in protest with masks on could be &quot;guilty by assosciation&quot; to being connected with the &quot;Anonymous&quot; group, and therefore they could all have been arrested under the pretense of CFAA.  Or am I wrong with my assumption?  Just a thought that I had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a Scientologist, nor do I agree that they are a &#8220;religion&#8221;; but as mentioned in your article, the Church of Scientology could press charges against anyone related to &#8220;Anonymous&#8221; under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).  So my question is this.  When &#8220;Anonymous&#8221; protested outside of the LA Scientology Church, couldn&#8217;t the church have called police to press charges against the protesting group calling themselves &#8220;Anonymous&#8221; as culprits to the CFAA done against them?<br />
The video I saw showed a guy with a bullhorn speaking out against the Church of Scientology, with him only wearing sunglasses.  His mask was off, and identity revealed.  Everyone there walking in protest with masks on could be &#8220;guilty by assosciation&#8221; to being connected with the &#8220;Anonymous&#8221; group, and therefore they could all have been arrested under the pretense of CFAA.  Or am I wrong with my assumption?  Just a thought that I had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duo</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Duo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Great article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I WANT Co$ to demand prosecution of these &quot;crimes&quot; under hate crimes laws so Anonymous can in turn show they are not a religion organization and, therefore, no hate crime was committed.

Because we did it for teh lulz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WANT Co$ to demand prosecution of these &#8220;crimes&#8221; under hate crimes laws so Anonymous can in turn show they are not a religion organization and, therefore, no hate crime was committed.</p>
<p>Because we did it for teh lulz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-34</guid>
		<description>WE ARENT HACKERS GET IT STRAIGHT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WE ARENT HACKERS GET IT STRAIGHT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Scientology = Serious Business</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientology = Serious Business</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I just watched the Tom Cruise Video. I can honestly say I have never seen somebody waffle so much ambiguous bullshit. Scientology is obviously a business designed to make money out of gullible people and Cruise vainly wants to believe he is in some kind of elite. I can&#039;t imagine how stupid or insecure you&#039;d have to be to want to become a Scientologist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched the Tom Cruise Video. I can honestly say I have never seen somebody waffle so much ambiguous bullshit. Scientology is obviously a business designed to make money out of gullible people and Cruise vainly wants to believe he is in some kind of elite. I can&#8217;t imagine how stupid or insecure you&#8217;d have to be to want to become a Scientologist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DiggidyLC</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/02/06/anonymous-versus-scientology-cyber-criminals-or-vigilante-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>DiggidyLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 19:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/22#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Great article.

Much love from your law buddies up in Portland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
<p>Much love from your law buddies up in Portland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
