<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word of the Week: Void Ab Initio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelegality.com/2008/01/28/word-of-the-week-void-ab-initio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/01/28/word-of-the-week-void-ab-initio/</link>
	<description>An Online Law Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/01/28/word-of-the-week-void-ab-initio/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 07:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/15#comment-603</guid>
		<description>Jeff, is there any difference between a &#039;void&#039; contract and a contract that is &#039;void ab initio&#039;? Is a court&#039;s declaration required for either (or both) before the contract can be treated as a nullity in its entirity, including, for example, a choice of exclusive jurisdiction clause? In other words, if a court&#039;s declaration  is required, which court will have jurisdiction to make such a declaration where the assailed contract includes an exclusive jurisdiction clause?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, is there any difference between a &#8216;void&#8217; contract and a contract that is &#8216;void ab initio&#8217;? Is a court&#8217;s declaration required for either (or both) before the contract can be treated as a nullity in its entirity, including, for example, a choice of exclusive jurisdiction clause? In other words, if a court&#8217;s declaration  is required, which court will have jurisdiction to make such a declaration where the assailed contract includes an exclusive jurisdiction clause?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JosephSHaas at hotmaildotcom</title>
		<link>http://www.thelegality.com/2008/01/28/word-of-the-week-void-ab-initio/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>JosephSHaas at hotmaildotcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelegality.com/archives/15#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jeff, and especially for that &quot;unfair&quot; word in paragraph #3, defined as &quot;Not just&quot;, and just meaning: Legitimate, as &quot;In compliance with the law&quot; from the Latin word legitimus, lawful, legal; and so when one of the parties to the agreement is not legal, then they are a trespasser ab initio from the start.  See an example of this over at http://www.answers.com/topic/ab-initio for how &quot;to correct abuses by public officers&quot;: file criminal +/or civil trespass charges against them. Thank you &quot;very&quot; much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jeff, and especially for that &#8220;unfair&#8221; word in paragraph #3, defined as &#8220;Not just&#8221;, and just meaning: Legitimate, as &#8220;In compliance with the law&#8221; from the Latin word legitimus, lawful, legal; and so when one of the parties to the agreement is not legal, then they are a trespasser ab initio from the start.  See an example of this over at <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/ab-initio" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://www.answers.com/topic/ab-initio');" rel="nofollow">http://www.answers.com/topic/ab-initio</a> for how &#8220;to correct abuses by public officers&#8221;: file criminal +/or civil trespass charges against them. Thank you &#8220;very&#8221; much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
